![]() ![]() In the former, too, “natural” assumptions must be questioned and the mythic basis of much so-called “fact” brought to light. If, as John Stuart Mill suggested, we tend to accept whatever is as natural, this is just as true in the realm of academic investigation as it is in our social arrangements. ![]() While the recent upsurge of feminist activity in this country has indeed been a liberating one, its force has been chiefly emotional-personal, psychological and subjective-centered, like the other radical movements to which it is related, on the present and its immediate needs, rather than on historical analysis of the basic intellectual issues which the feminist attack on the status quo automatically raises.1 Like any revolution, however, the feminist one ultimately must come to grips with the intellectual and ideological basis of the various intellectual or scholarly disciplines-history, philosophy, sociology, psychology, etc.-in the same way that it questions the ideologies of present social institutions. Implications of the Women’s Lib movement for art history and for the contemporary art scene-or, silly questions deserve long answers followed by eight replies ![]() Linda Nochlin, "Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?" ARTnews January 1971: 22-39 Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |